|
THE XB-70 VALKYRIE STORY |
|
|

In the 1960’s a 10-man crew of electronic engineers
and technicians operated the NASA High Range Tracking Station
at Beatty, Nevada. Initially, their primary mission was
the tracking of X-15 missions originating at Dryden/Edwards AFB in
California. When the XB-70 test flights began, NASA’s Dryden, Beatty,
and Ely tracking stations, along with Air Force, tracked the initial
flights originating at Palmdale. It wasn't
long before these two magnificent craft were moved to Dryden/Edwards
and
flown under the management of NASA at Dryden and those contracting for
NASA at the Beatty and Ely, Nevada High Range Tracking Stations.
"VALKYRE: Chooser of the slain: Any of the maidens of Odin who choose the heroes to be slain in battle and conduct them to Valhalla."
area51specialproject.com thanks NASA for providing links to the following clips of the Valkyrie taxiing and in flight
Originally conceived as a supersonic bomber, the North American XB-70A Valkyrie instead became the world's largest experimental research aircraft, flying from September 21, 1964, until February 4, 1969.
Two experimental prototypes of the XB-70A were under construction when the bomber program was canceled. At the same time there was growing interest in an American supersonic transport (SST), and the Valkyrie seemed a perfect testbed for SST research. The two prototypes were kept alive for a joint NASA-Air Force flight research program.
The Flight Research Center (FRC -- later the Dryden Flight Research Center) had several SST studies underway in the early 1960's. Its Douglas F5D-1 was used for landing studies, a North American F-100C was modified to simulate SST handling qualities, a North American A-5A was used to develop ways an SST would operate in the air traffic control system, and a Lockheed JetStar was modified as an in-flight SST simulator. But the XB-70A was the first transport-sized aircraft capable of sustained, long-range supersonic flight. Its research programs had a significant impact on American SST efforts at the time and could influence the design of future large, supersonic aircraft.
Although intended to cruise at Mach 3, the first aircraft was found to have poor directional stability above Mach 2.5, and it never flew faster than Mach 2.55 in its flight research at the NASA FRC between 1967 and 1969. However, NASA Ames wind-tunnel studies led North American Aviation, Downey, California, to build its sister ship with an added 5 degrees of dihedral on the wings. It handled much better, and achieved Mach 3.08 on April 12, 1966. Two months later it was lost in a mid-air collision during a formation photo flight.
One of the unique features of the Valkyries was the variable outer wing panel. It was left undeflected at subsonic speeds to take advantage of the full wingspan and wing area because that would increase the lift-to-drag ratio and improve takeoff and landing performance.
At supersonic speeds, adequate cruise lift-to-drag ratio could be developed with less wingspan, so the outer panels were folded down. Deflected, they reduced drag as the wingtips interacted with the inlet shock wave in the lower surface flow field. Lowering the wingtips also reduced the area behind the airplane center of gravity (cg). This phenomenon was important because as Mach number increased, the center of pressure moved rearward, so less area aft of the cg caused a reduction of trim drag. The outer panels also provided more vertical surface to improve directional stability.
|
In 1959, North American Aviation was awarded a contract to build "Weapons System 110" (WS-110). On paper, the project's goals seemed insurmountable; not just the biggest craft ever to take to the skies, but is was to be the fastest as well, to cruise at 3 times the speed of sound, at a time when no plane had yet flown that fast. The original WS-110 competition had boiled down to a competition between Boeing and North American. Although shaped differently, both of the original submissions had the following in common: Takeoff weight of 1,000,000 pounds. Large detachable portion of wing to allow for a Mach 3" dash to target "Mach-3 dash" ability only. They were far too large to use existing USAF facilities designed for the B-52. Needless to say, these proposals were rejected by the USAF, which sent Boeing and North American back to the drawing board. However, during the later phases of the design process, both companies realized that designing an aircraft to actually cruise at mach 3 wasn't really that much more demanding than designing one that only had a "dash" capability. Both teams went back to the drawing boards with what were the final requirements for the contract, which were:
Cruise Speed
of Mach 3 (2,000mph)
Cruise Altitude of 70,000 feet.
A "shirtsleeve" environment for the crew.
50,000 pound payload
A range of 7,500 miles
Another requirement called for sizing such that
existing runways, hangers, etc. that had already been built for the
B-52 could be used without further modification. Have flying
characteristics suitable for use with average USAF line crewmen.
Boeing's design was essentially very
similar to the later SST; that is, essentially a delta with 3 engines
(each
mounted in its own pod) under each wing.
North American engineers pored through every aerodynamic study they
could find ,looking for anything that could be applied to a large,
triple sonic bomber. They came across a forgotten NACA (now NASA)
research paper about "Compression Lift." This paper described how a
conical body underneath the center of awing would push the air to the
side, increasing pressure under the wing section (thereby increasing
lift!) with far less drag than simply increasing the size of the wing
itself. In flight, the XB-70 could lower the outer wing sections either
25 degrees for flying from 300 knots to Mach 1.4, or a severe 65
degrees for speeds from Mach 1.4 to Mach 3+.
Measuring just a bit over 20 feet at the trailing edge, these wingtips
represented the largest movable aerodynamic device ever used. Lowering
the wingtips had three distinct effects on theXB-70. Total vertical
area was increased, allowing shorter vertical stabilizers than would
otherwise be needed. The reduction in rearward wing area countered the
delta wing's inherent rearward shift of the center of lift as speed
increased ,keeping drag-inducing trim corrections to a minimum.
Compression lift was30 percent more effective because the shock-wave
under the wing was better managed. Along with the wingtips,
the six J93 engines, bomb bay, and landing gear were all contained in a
conical
shape designed to enhance shockwave management. Overall, the XB-70 has
the
best lift-to-drag ratio of any manned airplane ever built, being
bettered
only on the unmanned D-21 drone, an airframe designed to be
air-launched,
fly at one speed and altitude, and then self-destruct (there by not
needing
to land).
Early (Pre-Flight) History
By 1961, following the shooting down of the U-2
flown by Gary Powers over Russia, it became obvious that the
performance of surface-to-air missiles were improving much faster than
that of manned aircraft. Following long, loud, and bitter debate, it
was decided that the XB-70 would not be a viable bomber platform, and
theXB-70 program, as such, was canceled. Development of the F-108
Rapier, intended as a fighter escort to the XB-70, was also canceled.
Replacing the production bomber program was a limited program calling
for
three XB-70 prototypes to perform high-speed flight research. Although
this
vastly downsized program would have to carry the entire financial
burden for
the development of the XB-70s radically new construction techniques, as
well
as the J93 engine, the research data the program would gather would be
vitally
important for the future SST and other military projects. NASA and the
Air
Force would jointly manage and share the data garnered from the XB-70.
To help limit costs, a number of non-aerodynamic changes were
made to the XB-70. Positions for the navigator and bombardier were
removed,
leaving the XB-70 with just a pilot and co-pilot. The computerized
navigation
and bomb-guidance systems were replaced by the bare minimum
instrumentation needed to fly safely. In fact, only one TACAN (Tactical
Air Navigation) system
was installed, which later proved a great annoyance to the XB-70
pilots.
All three XB-70s were intended to be slightly different from each
other. The first XB-70 (referred to as AV/1 (AirVehicle/1) or Ship 1)
was built entirely from wind tunnel results and initial
computer-generated models (at this time, the computer modeling took
almost18 months to complete!). AV/2 would be slightly modified based on
further computer modeling and early experiences with AV/1. The third
airframe, AV/3,would have greater changes based on additional modeling,
and extensive flight data gathered from the first two aircraft. The
astute observer will notice that the 6' wind tunnel model at the
Smithsonian (National Air and Space Museum) is actually of AV/3 (that
is, it's a modified version of AV/2 -- note the canard angles).
Constructing the XB-70 required new fabrication techniques, reflecting
the production-oriented original design. Extensive use of costly
titanium and composite materials would have resulted in a bomber too
expensive for mass production, so North American decided to use a
stainless steel honeycomb construction -- something that had never been
tried before. To keep the weight down, the honeycomb itself was formed
of stainless steel just .02" thick! (for perspective, this was the
TOLERANCES (variation allowed) in the holes drilled in the frames of
WWII fighters to lighten them!) One production manager,
after seeing the specifications and being assured they were correct,
exclaimed," that's not metal, that's FOIL!" Welding such thin materials
was impossible, so a brazing technique had to be developed to assemble
the honeycomb structures. Titanium was used in certain heat-critical
areas, but overall, the expensive (and difficult to work with) metal
makes up only 9 percent of the Valkyrie's
structure.
XB-70 number one, with the tail number 20001 (generally referred to as
AV/1(Air Vehicle/1) or Ship 1) was rolled out of its hanger at North
American's Palmdale, California facility and into the public's view on
a bright and sunny May 11th, 1964. Just sitting on the ground, the
Valkyrie awed the audience. Her long, graceful neck over their heads,
air intakes a
man could stand in (and 80' long -- longer than an SR-71!), and sleek
lines left no doubt she was designed for speed. But just two months
later, the budget
axe took its swing, chopping AV/3 (which was in the early stages of
construction) out
of the program, and, unknowingly, crippled the entire XB-70 program.
Flight History
5:30am, 21 September, 1964 Al White (Chief Test
Pilot from North American) and Colonel Joseph Cotton (USAF) begin their
pre-flight inspection of the Valkyrie. Today's plan isn't a taxi test,
or an engine run-up. White and Cotton will lift the XB-70, the heaviest
plane ever built, into the skies above the Mojave Desert and fly from
North American's Palmdale facility to Edwards Air Force Base, the Air
Force's Flight Test Center (AFFTC). And this is no ordinary flight
plan! Once the Valkyrie is over Edwards AFB, it calls for retracting
the landing gear, and accelerating the XB-70 beyond the speed of sound
at30,000 feet over the desert. In doing so, North American Aviation
will receive a $125,000.00 bonus from the Air Force.
At 6:10, White and Cotton climb aboard the Valkyrie to begin the
pre-flight checklist. 35 minutes later, engine number one is started
and brought up to operating temperatures. Just moments later, in the
process of starting engine number two, caution lights go on in the
cockpit indicating a failure in the engine's cooling loop. Both engines
are shut down, and a few minutes later, the problem is tracked down to
a circuit breaker that is reset. The process of starting the engines is
begun anew at7:14 and goes off without a hitch.
Finally, with 132,000 pounds (the weight of an SR-71!) of fuel
indicated, the XB-70 begins taxiing towards the runway. This is a
delicate affair, because the XB-70 has demonstrated a major problem
with braking at low speeds (a violent chatter that caused the XB-70s
braking distance from just 5mph to be 400 feet!), making maneuvering a
tedious affair.
Finally, at 8:24, the Valkyrie is aligned on the runway. Al White
advances the six throttles to maximum afterburner, and the XB-70 begins
its take off run. At 193 mph, White rotates the long neck of the XB-70
into the air, establishing a nine degree Angle-of-Attack for the wing.
At 205 mph and
4,853 feet of runway, the 387,620 pounds of the Valkyrie lifts into the
blue
sky for the first time. Per the flight plan, speed was held at 310 mph
and
the gear left down for the flight to Edwards. No unusual handling
problems occurred during this time
At 8:51, the XB-70 was over Edwards, and, having met up with all the
chase planes involved, Cotton retracts the landing gear. A minute
later, waiting for the retraction indicators to go "green," a chase
plane calls out that the retraction had failed. The right side main
gear had stopped midway through the retraction sequence.
In order to be compact and save space, the XB-70s main landing gear
used a complex sequence of motions. From an extended point, the wheel
assembly would first rotate 90 degrees (becoming perpendicular to the
normal direction of travel).Then, the unit would be rotated 90 degrees
vertically, so that rear set of wheels were almost touching the top of
the gear's main strut. At this point, the main gear would rotate
backward until it was level within the fuselage. Now, however, the
right side gear had stopped after only completing the first motion
(rotating perpendicular to the direction of flight). The chase plane
reported seeing blue streaks on the fuselage behind the gear doors,
and that some kind of fluid was continuing to leak out. A leak in the
hydraulic
system was the suspected culprit, but in mid-flight, the only thing to
do
was to re-extend the landing gear before a loss of pressure made it
impossible
to do so. Cycled back to the extended position, the gear locked itself
back
into place, and the Valkyrie continued on her alternate flight plan,
proceeding
with some low speed handling tests, which showed stability and control
to
be more than acceptable -- it was better than the B-52!
Half an hour later, the number three engine was showing 108 percent
rpm, and was shut down. White and Cotton then proceeded to line up for
landing on the 15,000foot runway at Edwards. Almost 110 feet in front
of the landing gear, combined with the nose-up attitude required to
land the big delta wing, it was difficult for the pilots to judge their
altitude above the runway, or the actual point of touchdown (it was not
until the tenth flight that Al
White stopped using the chase planes to call out his altitude).
Aiming for touchdown 2,000 feet down the long runway, White smoothly
set the XB-70 on the ground. Almost immediately trouble set in.
Although White and Cotton couldn't sense it, a pressure surge in the
brake system had locked the rear wheels of the left side main gear,
causing a fire. Notified of this,
White let the Valkyrie coast to a stop, using 10,800 feet of runway.
Once
the fire was extinguished, repairs had to be made before the XB-70
could be
taxied away.
On October 5th, 1964, White and Cotton again took the Valkyrie into the
air, again with the intention of achieving supersonic flight (This
time, there would be no bonus, but following this flight, North
American would be assessed penalties for each additional flight until
the XB-70 broke the sound barrier).
Following takeoff, with a chase plane on each side, the landing gear
was retracted, then lowered, then retracted again without a problem.
With the landing gear up and stowed away, the XB-70 climbed up to
28,000 feet and
accelerated to 600mph (Mach .85) in preparation for supersonic flight.
Here
again gremlins struck the Valkyrie. The primary hydraulic system began
losing
pressure, and the XB-70 headed back to Edwards. By the time she was on
her
final approach, the landing gear had to be lowered using the emergency
electrical
system. The actual touchdown on the lake bed was uneventful, and the
XB-70 rolled to a stop after 10,000feet.
A week later, on October 12th, 1964, the Valkyrie burst through the
sound barrier for the first time, reaching a speed of Mach 1.1 before
decelerating beneath the sound barrier and breaking back through
several times to check trans-sonic stability.
October 24th, 1964, represented the Valkyrie's Last flight for a
while. Returning to North American's Palmdale facility at The end of
this
flight, the XB-70 was scheduled to go through a series of Structural
tests
that would not return her to the flight line until February of 1965.For
the first time, the wingtips were lowered to the middle position of
25degrees.
Reaching a maximum speed of Mach 1.4, the XB-70 remained supersonic for
40 continuous minutes, establishing a new world's record for sustained
supersonic
flight. The overall time of the flight was cut short, as fuel
consumption
proved to be higher than expected.
Upon returning to Palmdale, engineers puzzled over why the Valkyrie had
been shedding herself of paint on all but her first flight. Although
not overly concerned, no one was especially happy with unexplainable
things on a plane that was to test the limits of jet-powered flight!
Although some observers wondered if the Air Force was being entirely
truthful about the XB-70's top speed, it was finally determined that
too-thick paint caused by several re-paintings (in order to pretty the
plane up for various VIPs) was being cracked as the Valkyrie flexed in
flight, and was then torn away by the air stream. During her winter
stay at Plant 42, the XB-70 was carefully repainted with just a single,
thin coat of white paint.
AV/1 returned to flight on February 16th,1965. This flight would return
the XB-70 to Edwards AFB(about 30 miles by air from North American's
Palmdale facility). For the first time, the wingtips were lowered to
the full 65 degree
mark. Accelerating to Mach 1.6, Joe Cotton then adjusted the AICS (Air
Induction
Control System)-- The series of ramps inside the intakes which would
expand
and contract to manipulate airflow to the engines and protect them from
the deadly onslaught of high-speed air.
After another 40 minutes of supersonic flight, the Valkyrie landed, but
with the drag chutes failing to deploy, the landing run was over11,100
feet. The sixth flight was the first time someone other than Al White
and Joseph Cotton were at the controls. Lt. Col. Fitzhugh "Fitz" Fulton
(later to be NASA's Chief Test Pilot) flew as copilot with Al White as
pilot. Butagain hydraulic leaks cut this flight short. Engineers at
North American worked continuously to modify the hydraulic systems
(which operated at 4000psi,more than 35% greater pressure than any
other aircraft's system) to end the constant problems of leakage that
had disrupted almost every flight. Although these changes were never
totally effective on AV/1, AV/2 benefited Greatly from the misfortunes
suffered by the first plane.
The seventh flight, on March4th, White and Fulton shattered records
again, sustaining supersonic flight for 60 minutes, reaching a top
speed of
Mach 1.85. The eighth flight introduced the last of the four pilots,
North American's Van Shepard, to the aircraft, and saw Mach 2 fall to
the six J93 engines.
On the tenth flight ,the Valkyrie sustained 74 minutes of supersonic
flight, including 50 minutes beyond Mach2! May 7th, 1965 was AV/1's
12th flight,
with Al White and Fitz Fulton at the controls. Traveling at Mach 2.58
(almost
1700mph!), a 'thump' was heard in the cockpit, soon followed by a
number
engine-related alarms. Engines three, four, five, and six were shut
down
right away. As the chase planes caught up, they reported that the
horizontal
splitter (the very apex of the delta wing) had torn away. Obviously,
the
debris had gone into the intakes and done severe damage to the engines.
For
the final approach, the number five engine was restarted to provide
some thrust
from the right side, and the XB-70 landed on the long lakebed without
major
incident. All six engines, nearly one-sixth of the 38 ever built, were
destroyed
beyond repair.
After this flight, the splitter itself was replaced with a single solid
piece in place of the honeycomb unit that had failed. At this point,
concerns about the integrity of the honeycomb skin began, and the next
4 flights
concerned themselves with "heat soaking" the skin for sustained periods
of
time. For the first time, the XB-70s ability to reach Mach 3 was
questioned.
AV/2 (tai l number 20207) made its first flight on July 17th, 1965.
Lacking the gremlins of AV/1's first flight, the wingtips were lowered
65 degrees, and a top speed of Mach 1.4 was reached before landing at
Edwards AFB. AV/2 differed from her older sibling, inside and out.
Internally, a more flexible system of hydraulic fittings were used, to
reduce the leaking that continued to troubleAV/1. The techniques to
build
the honeycomb skin and improved with experience, and hopefully would
not
suffer any of the troublesAV/1 was undergoing. Learning from
experience,
the fuel tanks on AV/2 were inspected very carefully, to avoid the
internal
leakage problems which ultimately rendered AV/1's number five
(centerline
fuselage) unusable. An automatic control for the AICS was installed, in
place of AV/1's manual system, which used a grid of speed and altitude
that
the pilots used as a reference to set the actual ramp position.
Externally, the difference was obvious -- the Wings had been given 5
degrees of dihedral. This change was a result of testing that showed
AV/1 to have poor roll stability at high speed with the wingtips fully
lowered. The trade off was that, at low speeds with the wingtips up,
AV/2 suffered from severe "dihedral effect" -- a situation where
sideslip causes the plane to drop one wing. The pilot, sensing the low
wing but not spotting the sideslip, would use the ailerons to try and
bring the wing back up -- which actually caused MORE sideslip, forcing
the wing to drop lower! One pilot remarked "it felt like being backed
into a corner." The only solution was for pilots to closely watch the
side slip indicator.
Another instrumentation problem cropped up during high-speed flight. At
Mach 3, just one degree of pitch would send the XB-70 into a 3,000 foot
per minute change of altitude. Combined with raising the nose ramp
(windscreen assembly) to the "supersonic" position, which blocked the
pilots' view of the horizon (and tended to reflect the ground below,
leading to several complaints of vertigo), the Valkyrie was virtually
impossible to keep at a fixed altitude. Eventually, a highly sensitive
rate-of-climb meter from a helicopter was Installed
to help (but not entirely fix) this problem.
October 14th, 1965. "On this flight the XB-70 proved its capability of
attaining Mach 3 at 70,000 feet!"-- Al White's summary in the pilot's
report
for Flight 1-17.
As AV/1 crossed the Mach 3threshold, her nose abruptly pitched upwards.
But even as Al White corrected, the nose just as sharply pitched
downward.
Combined with the correction, the XB-70 accelerated just enough to
cause
a brief moment of overpressure in the inlets. Stabilizing the Valkyrie,
Al
White keyed his microphone and spoke the words everyone had been
waiting
for, "There's that big magic number[Mach 3]."
For almost three minutes, everything appeared fine. Suddenly, White and
Cotton heard something behind them. Although no caution lights had come
on,
and concerned about damage caused by the overpressure, White decided to
decelerate and let the chase planes catch up with the XB-70. When they
did,
they reported that about 2 feet of the left wing's leading Edge was
missing.
Fortunately, the damaged section of the wing was far enough outboard
that
the debris wasn't drawn into the engine inlets. After 56 weeks and 17
flights,AV/1
had finally reached her goals -- but she would never fly at Mach 3
again.
The design team, alarmed with the skin separation problems, and knowing
that improvements in AV/2 would solve the problem, decided that from
that
point on, AV/1 would be limited to a maximum speed of Mach 2.5. Mach 3
research would be left to the improved, and more capable, second
aircraft.
Initially,AV/2 (tail number 20207) wasn't completely trouble-free.
Brake chatter continued to be a problem during low-speed taxiing,
although it was suspected that this stemmed from the lack of return
springs for the brake pads (like automobiles, the Valkyrie was designed
for the pads to lightly touch the rotors at all times). Far more
troubling, however, were problems in the new, automatic AICS system,
which would inexplicably recycle during supersonic flight, causing an
"unstart," where the shockwave from the forward fuselage, rather than
being deflected past the inlet and under the wing, instead
fell directly into the inlet. Not only did this change in inlet airflow
cause
a brief flameout on the engines, but it also caused a dramatic loss of
lift
on that side, since the XB-70s wings depended on that high-pressure air
for
a large portion of their lift. Some times, speed and throat ramp
settings
would create a condition where the shockwave was right at the boundary
of
the inlet, jumping in and out. This "buzz" was a serious condition that
had
to be rectified immediately-- left to continue for more than a few
moments, the stresses could have torn the XB-70 apart!
Following the 8th flight of AV/2, White stated in his pilot's report
that he didn't feel comfortable trying for Mach 3 until the AICS was
sorted out, which took several additional flights. As this was sorted
out, concerns were voiced that AV/2 might also suffer skin separation
problems under the heating caused by sustained high-speed flight,
despite the improved construction and
assembly techniques. It was decided that with AV/2, early flights would
involve
"heat-soaking" at speeds less than Mach 3. This way unlike a quicker
"dash"
up to speed, the airframe would reach the full temperature created by
flight
at that speed.
Heat is the major enemy of speed. Caused by the friction of cutting
through the air, heat has limited the top speed of modern aircraft
(such as the F-15) far more than power. Beyond Mach 2.5,friction
increases at an ever-growing rate (for comparison, an SR-71 operating
at Mach 2.2 heats up to about 275 degrees, but at Mach 3.2, skin
temperatures rise to almost 900 degrees!).
The same aerodynamics that gave the XB-70 so little drag helped
minimize heat buildup. The hottest portions of the Valkyrie, her nose
and horizontal splitter, reached a temperature of only 625 degrees
during Mach 3 flight, with the majority of the XB-70s skin at a
temperature of just 450 degrees! Equipment was placed in the fuel
tanks, which acted as heat sinks. As the fuel soaked up the heat from
the fuselage, it was drawn into the engines
and burned away, leaving the cooler fuel behind. At the same time, it
had
to be replaced with nitrogen gas. The temperatures inside the tanks
were
high enough that just two percent oxygen would have caused the fuel to
burst
into flames -- a decidedly undesirable event.
On her 15th flight, on December 11th, 1965, AV/2 ran at Mach 2.8 for20
minutes (spending 41 total minutes beyond Mach 2.5) without any
indications
of skin separation. Ten days later, after seven minutes at Mach 2.9
(and
20 minutes above Mach 2.8), the oil pump for the number four engine
failed,
shutting down the engine, White and Cotton headed back to Edwards, when
an over temperature caution came on for the number six engine, which
was
shut down as well. After landing, it was discovered that, despite the
early
shutdown, loss of lubrication had ruined engine number four -- an
unhappy
moment in a flight program that now only had 29 engines left (with 12
needed
just to get the two planes in the air!). The number six engine was
removed
and sent off to General Electric for rebuilding.
Engine installation was another ground-breaking feature of the XB-70.
Unlike other airplanes, where all the engine's accessories were bolted
to the plane, and then connected to the engine (making removal a
tedious job), on the Valkyrie, everything was bolted to the engine
itself, making engine removal and replacement a job that could be done
in just a couple of hours. Today, many military and commercial planes
use this design.
Less than 6 months after her first flight, AV/2 reached her goal of
Mach
3, on her 17th flight (coincidently, the same number of flights AV/1 to
reach Mach 3). Just for three minutes, then back home for a through
examination. No sign of skin damage at all! Prudence was still the
watchword, however, and AV/2 twice more poked her sleek nose beyond
Mach 3 for just a few minutes before sustaining Mach 3 for 15 minutes
on her22nd flight.
Feeling secure that AV/2 would not have the same skin separation
problems of AV/1, extensive performance and control testing at speeds
above Mach 2.7, but below Mach3 were the next step. This data was
important for determining what the handling abilities of the SST
(intended to cruise at around Mach 2.7) would be like.
Already, it had become obvious that no SST could be expected to use the
established approach routes to airports! Some sonic boom testing
(although not as extensive as later on) was also conducted. The
viability of the SST depended on high-altitude sonic booms being
greatly dissipated as compared to lower altitude sonic boom effects.
To the dismay of many, early tests indicated this would not be the
case. At this point in March, 1966, AV/1 was getting ready for her 37th
flight, with Van Shepard as pilot, and Joseph Cotton as co-pilot.
Control and performance tests were on the flight plan -- but soon it
was a different performance being
tested.
Halfway through the planned flight, BOTH hydraulic systems -- primary
and secondary -- began to fail. Shepard quickly brought the Valkyrie
home as Cotton extended the landing gear. No green indicators came on,
followed by a call from the chase plane that there was trouble with
both sets of main
gear. On the left side, the gear hadn't fully lowered before rotating
to
meet the direction of travel, leaving her rear wheels higher, rather
than
lower, than the front set of wheels. The right side gear was in worse
shape
-- it hadn't lowered at all before rotating. Even more alarming, it
hadn't
rotated completely inline with the direction of travel, although it was
close.
The emergency backup system failed to correct the problem, and with
overall control of the aircraft rapidly coming into question, engineers
on the ground had to think quickly, or face losing an aircraft that was
a half-billion dollar investment. After what must have seemed like
hours in the cockpit, engineers on the ground called up to the pilots
with their plan. Shepard would
land the Valkyrie on the dry lake bed, so there would be plenty of room
to
ease to a stop. It was felt that, on touchdown, the left side gear
would
level itself out, the sheer weight of the XB-70 forcing the gear into
its
normal position. As for the right gear...being behind the centerline of
the
main strut, it was unlikely that the gear would level out, but
hopefully the
landing would at least cause the gear to finish swinging into the
direction of travel, and the wingtip would still clear the ground,
although the right side would be much lower than the left.
Van Shepard gingerly set AV/1 down on the lakebed, and each main gear
did what the engineers expected. So now, the plane was down and
rolling, but she
wanted to turn sharply to the right-- threatening to ground loop,
which, although likely not fatal to the pilots, would likely destroy
the aircraft. So Shepard kept applying power to the number six
(farthest right side) engine to help keep the XB-70 somewhat straight,
but at the same time, he couldn't use too much power, or the plane
wouldn’t ever stop! Finally, after rolling almost three miles, the
XB-70 completed her landing run, which, when viewed from above, looked
like an upside-down letter "J" because the XB-70 had not
just swung over half a mile to the right side, but by the time she came
to
a stop, she had turned 110 degrees, almost pointing in the direction
she
had come from! Only the huge size of the lakebed made this landing
possible --anywhere else, the XB-70 would have been far off the runway
and likely into buildings and hangars (another decidedly undesirable
event).
Later that same month, to the joy of a great many Texans, it was
decided that AV/2 would be flown down to Carswell AFB for the air show
there. It was to be the only airfield that Ship Two would fly to and
return. With Fitz Fulton at the controls, the Valkyrie spent only 13
minutes at Mach 2.6 before slowing up, winding up at 6,000 feet over
Carswell AFB just 59 minutes after takeoff! For the next half hour,
AV/2 thundered around the skies of Texas before landing. The return
flight two days later was the only flight during the entire program
where performance data was not recorded, as Cotton (in the pilot's
seat) and White flew back at subsonic speeds, taking a little over
three hours to return to Edwards. Then AV/2 was off to heat soak for
even longer times -- over 30 minutes-- at speeds of Mach 2.8 and 2.9,
as well
as flights of 16 and 20 minutes at Mach 3. Flights 35 and 36 were used
to
get a better look at the causes and ways to remedy unstarts at speeds
above
Mach 2.5.
April 30th, 1966. Al White and Joe Cotton prepared to take AV/2 past
the final hurdle to having" unlimited" status for Mach 3 flight-- a 30+
minute run at Mach 3 to fully heat soak all systems. Shortly after
takeoff, Cotton retracted the landing gear. The nose gear jammed into
its door, and as good as things had been going, they were going bad
now. The attempt to lower the gear using the normal hydraulic system
failed. Trying the backup electrical system, Cotton heard a "pop" as
THAT system went dead. Given the Valkyrie's long, graceful neck, and
the intake design, retracting the main gear and landing
on her belly wasn't possible-- in fact, it was so impossible that North
American
had never attempted to simulate it!
White first brought the XB-70 around for a touch-and-go, Hoping that a
hard impact on the main gear would knock the nose gear loose and let it
fall to the extended position. Even after a second try, however, the
nose
gear remained jammed. At this point, bailing out and losing the
aircraft
was quickly becoming the only option. But there was fuel to burn away
in
any case, so while people on the ground pulled out plans and diagrams,
White and Cotton circled around Edwards slowly but surely. Finally,
Cotton was sent to the back of the cockpit to open service panels and
check on things for the people below. After more than an hour of this
(and 2 hours of flying), the problem with the backup system was traced
-- hopefully -- to a circuit breaker. Now all Cotton had to do was find
a way to short circuit the unit by closing two contacts. Of course, the
Valkyrie had no on-board toolkit -- that would have made things too
simple. But Cotton HAD brought along his
briefcase with his various notes and plans, and opening it, he found a
good,
thick paperclip. Straightening out the paperclip, then grasping the
middle
of it with a leather glove, Cotton carefully reached in and ZAP! short
circuited
the breaker.
As Al White hit the switch to extend the gear, and was rewarded with
the sound of a working backup system, Cotton gratefully dropped into
his seat. As several newspapers exclaimed the following day, a "39 cent
paperclip saves $750 million aircraft!" And indeed it had. In the
landing, however, the main gear bogies had been damaged, and would take
two weeks to repair -- although this was a tiny price compared to
losing the aircraft.
Unbeknownst to everyone involved, the loss of the AV/2 wasn't avoided,
but merely postponed a little longer. Finally, on May 19th, flight
number 39, AV/2 flew at Mach 3 for 33 minutes, and a total of 62
minutes beyond Mach 2.5. In just 91 minutes, the Valkyrie traveled over
2,400 miles -- an average speed of more than 1500 miles per hour,
including takeoff and landing! Finally, all remaining concerns about
skin separation were laid to rest.
Listening to the VHF and UHF radios at the Beatty Tracking Station, it
seemed that every mission the chase planes would report a loose object
flying
off the massive plane. Being located central along the normal flight
path
for the X-15 and XB-70, a straight line from Wendover, Utah to Edwards
AFB,
our radar sight usually carried the load of tracking these flights.
Even
though the aircraft transmitted a thousand watt beacon each time one of
our radars interrogated the transponder, neither Edwards or the Ely
radar
could track either plane. I vividly recall a mission where the XB-70
was
to conduct a Mach3+ speed run. Neither the T33 or F104 chase planes
were
capable of these speeds, which meant the Valkyrie was going to run away
from its chase planes. (During a normal mission, these chase planes
would
actually maneuver around the much larger plane to visually inspect it
for
any anomalies.) The mission went well, the Valkyrie outrunning its
chases.
The plane had turned to head back to Edwards and its chase escort when
all of a sudden Cotton announced loss of engines. My crew at Beatty
were the only ones tracking the plane’s beacon as it starting losing
altitude over Mt. Charleston near Las Vegas, Nevada. Suddenly, the
Valkyrie lost auxiliary electrical power, causing the beacon return to
disappear from our
radar scopes and loss of radio contact.. Skin track of the plane was
sketchy,
but from all indications, the plane was going to crash into Mt.
Charleston.
At a mere 500 feet altitude above the highest peak, the beacon suddenly
reappeared and Cotton’s cheerful voice filled our speakers as he
announced
restart of his engines. The chase planes located the plane and escorted
it safely home to Edwards.
The improved methods used to build AV/2were more than up to the task of
sustained Mach 3 flight. After this, AV/2flew to test stability and
control at subsonic and supersonic speeds. On May 22nd, 1966, AV/2
thrilled the spectators at the Armed Forces Day show at Edwards,
including a couple of supersonic passes over the crowd. At this point,
with all systems tested, the XB-70 program
prepared to move into Phase 2, where NASA would become much more
involved,
and extensive sonic boom and handling tests would begin. New pilots
would
join the program, including NASA Chief Test Pilot Brigadier General Joe
Walker,
who had just wound down the X-15 program.
Not only did Walker have an "astronaut" rating (given to any pilot who
flew higher than 50 miles, which the X-15 did), he had flown the X-15
beyond
Mach 6 (4,100mph) in level flight (a later flight by Pete Knight with
external
tanks did more then 4,500mph). Also joining the program was USAF Major
Carl
Cross. At the same time, both Al White and Joseph Cotton would
gradually
ease out of the program, with Cotton going on to test newer planes for
the
Air Force, and White to work on other projects at North American.
The Valkyrie had reached her goals, and been tested successfully. Al
White had achieved his goals for the XB-70 program. In preparation for
Phase 2, AV/2 was refitted with even more data recording equipment,
costing more than $50 million. These instruments would give a better
look at a number of phenomena that couldn't be thoroughly tested in a
wind tunnel – information regarding body flex, flutter, and pressure.
At the same time, NASA began setting up a large number of ground
sensors to precisely measure the effect of sonic booms.
June 8th, 1966. Major Carl Cross sits in the
Valkyrie's cockpit for the first time, with Al White in the pilot's
seat. Their flight plan is simple: they will make several passes over
recording instruments at
a speed of Mach 1.4 at 32,000 feet, then, at the request of General
Electric, they will fly in formation with 4 other GE-powered aircraft
so that GE photographers can take some publicity pictures. The
boom-testing went smoothly, then, dropping subsonic speed and raising
the wingtips back to 25 degrees, the Valkyrie joined
up in formation with the other aircraft, including, just off her right
wingtip,
an F-104 Starfighter piloted by Joe Walker. As the photo shoot
progressed, the photographers asked several times for the formation to
close up, until all five planes were in close proximity, and had been
for over 45 minutes.
(Author's note:
At the Beatty tracking station we routinely recorded the communications
channel
on a Fisher tape recorder. Only moments before the Mid-air Joe Walker
officially
notified mission control that he was encountering turbulence. He
further stated
for the record that he opposed this mission as it was too dangerous and
had no
scientific value. [The purpose of the mission was to provide General
Electric,
the manufacturer of the engines for the planes in formation, a photo
for the
cover of their brochures to be presented at an upcoming shareholders'
meeting]
Immediately after the crash, Mr. Bill Houck, the NASA monitor at our
station,
requested I give him the tape for dispatch to NASA at Dryden.)
Finally, at 9:26am, the photographers were done,
and everyone prepared to break formation and return to Edwards.
Disaster struck at this moment as somehow, Walker's F-104 collided with
the Valkyrie. The complex airflow surrounding the XB-70 lifted the
F-104 over her back ,spun the Starfighter around 180 degrees, causing
it to smash down along the center of the Valkyrie's wing, tearing off
both vertical stabilizers and damaging the left wingtip before falling
away in flames. Already, Joseph A. Walker, one of America's greatest
pilots, was dead.
"Midair! Midair! Midair!" Al White and Carl Cross heard the impact, but
felt nothing. Flying in theT-38 Off the left wingtip, Joe Cotton called
out "207 (identifying AV/2) you've been hit! You've been hit!" But in
those first moments, neither White nor Cross heard the call. Even as
Cotton continued "okay, you're doing fine, he got the verticals, but
you're still doing fine," White turned to Cross and asked "I wonder who
got hit?" Sixteen seconds after the impact, the XB-70 started a slight
roll. Al White corrected the roll --
and instantly recognized the Valkyrie's peril as she began a snap roll
to
the right.
Ramming the number six engine's throttle to maximum afterburner, he
tried to save AV/2 – but after 2 slow rolls, the plane broke into a
sickening spin, taking any hopes of recovery with it. White pushed his
seat back into the eject position, but caught his arm in the ejection
pod's clamshell doors as they closed. Unable to communicate with the
struggling Carl Cross, and unable to eject until getting his arm clear,
White could only watch his co-pilot fail to get into his pod for
ejection. Finally, with the realization that he needed to get out now,
Al White worked his arm clear and ejected just moments
before AV/2 slammed into the ground a few miles north of Barstow,
California.
Although the drogue chutes deployed from White's pod, he realized the
airbag
underneath the pod-- designed to absorb much of the impact -- had
failed
to inflate.
Striking the ground, White took a 44G impact -- lessened to 33Gs as his
chair broke free of its mountings. Amazingly, although banged,
battered, and bruised, he suffered no broken bones. Although White
returned to flight status just three months later, he never flew the
XB-70 again.
Carl Cross was not so lucky. Still in his seat, he impacted the
ground with AV/2 in a relatively flat configuration and was killed
instantly.
In just 76 seconds, 2 men, and one of the greatest planes ever built
were
gone.
Following the crash and subsequent investigation,
which blamed several people for allowing the "unofficial" photo shoot,
several key
modifications were made to AV/1. Amongst the important changes were
modifications
to the ejection system to make it easier, and the installation of
modified
brakes to allow for return springs for the brake pads. Unsurprisingly,
the
brake modification cured the problem of brake chatter at low speeds.
The
instrumentation package was upgraded to a system similar to the package
installed
on AV/2. Both the USAF and NASA were unsure thatAV/1, with her Mach 2.5
speed limitation and general gremlin troubles, could perform the
research
intended for AV/2. Ultimately, after a few more flights, the Air Force
bowed
out of the XB-70 program, leaving NASA to carry on additional flights
on
its own. Although not doing as well as AV/2 would have, the older
Valkyrie
soldiered on for 33 additional flights, garnering valuable data about
high-speed
flight. Finally, on February 4th,1969, AV/1 took off for her
eighty-second,
and final flight, to the Air Force Museum at Wright Field, in Dayton,
Ohio.
Gathering data throughout the entire flight, Fitz Fulton made a pass
over
the runway before bringing the XB-70 down for a perfect landing, then,
handing
the logbook to the museum curator, officially ended the XB-70 program.
Today,
the Valkyrie resides inside the recently built Modern Aviation hanger,
finally
protected from the ravages of time. Summary Some have looked at the
XB-70
program, pointed out that the expenditure of $1.3 billion only resulted
in128
flights and one high-maintenance aircraft at the USAF Museum. Others
have
pointed to the YF-12 and SR-71 as far more successful and capable
testbeds
for Mach 3 flight. But the Valkyrie was more than just an airplane. It
was
a complete package that advanced aerodynamic design, created the
template
for honeycomb construction, and allowed for extensive testing almost a
decade
before the first SR-71 appeared at an air show. In addition, the YF-12
and
SR-71 were never destined for mass production-- their cost was far too
high
with the composite and titanium skin, and maintenance costs off the
charts
(In 1991, with just a few airframes in service, the USAF still spent
more
than $400 million on maintaining the Blackbird) .Much of the costs
related
to theXB-70 would have easily been amortized out had production ever
become
a reality. The J93 engines, the tooling to build the airframes -- all
of
this normally would have been spread across hundreds of aircraft.
Indeed,
indirectly, the research from the program went on to benefit many
aircraft,
from supersonic fighters to mundane commercial jetliners.
Had AV/2 not been lost, there would certainly have been many, many more
flights. But even with the limited flights, and the use of AV/1 at the
end of the program, critical data regarding the SST was gained. Even
though
we don't think about it, the Valkyrie effectively killed the SST
program
by showing that supersonic flight by airliners, no matter how high they
flew, would have too great a sonic boom at ground level to ever be
acceptable.
Modern test programs have involved high angles of attack, improved
control,
and many other features important to the planes of tomorrow. But unlike
the
Valkyrie, they represent advances into the known, enhancements of what
aircraft
are capable of today. The Valkyrie was conceived in 1959,a year when
the
Air Force was getting its first Mach 2 fighter (ironically, the F-104
Starfighter), yet
here was a program calling for a Mach 3 bomber with long-range
endurance.
And despite never being truly optimized from flight data, the program
developed
a plane that could take off weighing more than538,000 pounds, and
cruise
at three times the speed of sound. The magic of the Valkyrie is not
just
in what she accomplished, but in how far she reached to accomplish it.
Compared with the technology today, those of us responsible
for the tracking, communication, telemetry, and instrumentation of the
XB-70 flights (and those of the X-15, SR-71, and Lifting Bodies) were
operating with equipment barely out of the stone age. Our radar systems
were 1940's Mod-2 systems scrapped at Cape Canaveral and passed on to
Edwards. Merely pulling a chassis caused wiring installation to crumble
to the floor, exposing the bare wire. Originally designed for a maximum
range of about 80 miles, the systems had been modified for extended
range. Locking on a thousand-watt beacon made it possible to track the
XB-70 for hundreds of miles. Many a time I witnessed the return spike
reaching the end of the base-line of the radar scope only to reappear
at the start of baseline as the range of the craft being tracked moved
further away. Somehow, we always managed to bring our test pilots home.
I’ll never forget hearing the gut-wrenching "Midair, Midair" distress
call while sitting at my console at the Beatty Tracking Station. In a
state of disbelief, I listened to the mission audio recording five
times Before placing it in the overnight dispatch to NASA at Dryden. I
didn’t personally know Carl Cross as I did General Joe Walker and
Colonel Joseph Cotton. It saddens me still to think that Carl and Joe
gave their lives merely to provide General Electric with a neat
photograph to place on the cover of a corporate brochure. For no
scientific reason whatsoever, we lost two brave test pilots and
aerospace program that would have launched our nation into the 21st
century
sixty years before its time.
THE VALKYRIE PILOTS
The links below takes you to details and photos of the midair crash of the XB-70
Special thanks to NASA and Tony Landis for the photos of the midair and crash of the XB-70 and Joe Walker's F-104 depicted as a slide show of the crash sequence at the link below.
|
Return Previous Page
| 1Visitors Today 157Visitors This Week |